49 years I have been watching and I have yet to see any unconditional love expressed by mortal man. This extends as well to the animal kingdom.
Did you know that you can have a pet for years and if someone else comes along and starts feeding and caring for them they will switch loyalties on you? I've seen this in action. Animals will remain loyal as long as no one else competes for their loyalties. I find this extremely interesting.
God is the only entity that is fully capable of unconditional love. He is perfect. Therefore he is the only one that can experience unconditional love. Hence the fact that he loves us in spite of our sin. But we as humans don't even come close.
I have tried unconditional love myself and it is quite hard to do. Mortal man is quite challenging to love unconditionally. It really cannot be done.
Some people confuse loyalty with unconditional love. They are two different things. I can be loyal to someone faster than I can give unconditional love to them. Animals, because they cannot speak or relate their feelings to us in words have only actions to show us. We are left to figure out what those actions mean. An animal has the act of loyalty that they show in place of love. We as humans can say "I Love You" or show it in any number of ways. Animals are restricted in this sense. They can't buy jewelry or houses or clothes or food to show love. They cannot speak "I Love You". What they can do however, is lick your face, or lay next to you or wag their tail when they see you or run up to you to greet you, etc. That is the way animals show love. What it comes down to with animals is who is feeding and caring for them. When that gets challenged they will go with the individual who they feel meets their needs the most.
People on the other hand are a little more complicated. Because in the animal world you don't have two animals dating or pledging their love or getting married, etc. Things are much more simplistic.
In the human realm not so. People are fickle, they have short memories, are considerably selfish and juvenile. They get angry over things that aren't important, they hold grudges, they are vindictive. They also are quite passoniate and can go to extreme lengths to show how they really feel. But more often times than not they do so in a mysterious manner. Very few people have the capabilities to show exactly how they feel without covering it up so it cannot be easily read. People do this religiously. They are cryptic when it comes to how they feel. You are supposed to read their signs to know what they are saying.
Animals are not like this. They will let you know when they are happy or mad and very rarely is their any mistaking what they are showing you. Not so with humans.
I find it interesting that God has such compassion for his creation when his creation obviously has no regard for him.
I have been blamed many times for having a healthy dislike for mankind. I do. I find it vulgar that mankind can slap God in the face repeatedly every single day and demand things their way when God has given them great gifts already. People constantly look to other humans to fulfill the needs that only God can meet and they get angry when other humans fall short. But they continue to try regardless. Yes, sometimes I feel as if I am the only person in the world that wants and seeks God's approval, not man's.
People don't realize how hard it is being human. They take so much for granted that they don't see what is really going on. In 2000 years man has not changed at all. If I had to say I would admit that man has actually gotten worse instead of better. The hard part is having to watch it happen day in and day out.
But know this, there is no unconditional love in the champagne room.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Her Royal Highness Suri Hubbard
I saw an interesting picture of Suri "Cruise" this past weekend and in spite of all the rumors that have been floated that Katie Holmes was IVF'd with Hubbard's frozen sperm I laughed it off and wasn't sure if I really wanted to go there. But now, I have no choice. I look at the child and look at pictures of Hubbard (especially picts of him in his younger days) and I have to say yeah, that's the father all right.
If you were to take Holmes and Hubbard and mix them together that would be about what the offspring would look like.
I would like to know just what she was told when inseminated. How did they approach her and what did they say to make her want to do this? "You have been chosen to carry the seed of the great L RON HUBBARD", or "You are royalty and royalty must breed royalty", or The honor of carrying the child of L Ron Hubbard is an honor that few women can claim in their lifetime". Whatever the bullshit that she was told she did her job and I wonder what her life expectancy will be now. She isn't needed anymore. The child is old enough to be raised by the higher ups in the church.
I figure one of these days real soon that Katie will cease to exist due to some type of Natasha Richardson-esque accident. Something that no one will question, but all will mourn and she will be hailed as a great actress.
Can the powers that be ever come up with something "believable"? I get tired of my intelligence consistently being insulted.
If you were to take Holmes and Hubbard and mix them together that would be about what the offspring would look like.
I would like to know just what she was told when inseminated. How did they approach her and what did they say to make her want to do this? "You have been chosen to carry the seed of the great L RON HUBBARD", or "You are royalty and royalty must breed royalty", or The honor of carrying the child of L Ron Hubbard is an honor that few women can claim in their lifetime". Whatever the bullshit that she was told she did her job and I wonder what her life expectancy will be now. She isn't needed anymore. The child is old enough to be raised by the higher ups in the church.
I figure one of these days real soon that Katie will cease to exist due to some type of Natasha Richardson-esque accident. Something that no one will question, but all will mourn and she will be hailed as a great actress.
Can the powers that be ever come up with something "believable"? I get tired of my intelligence consistently being insulted.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
A Dynastical Blow
Well Natasha Richardson is dead. This came out of nowhere. But the details or LACK OF THEM tells a very interesting story.
There is not much of a story to begin with. Natasha was skiing in Canada (location really doesn't matter). She was with an "instructor" on a "beginner slope". She fell down, got back up, didn't seem to be impaired and continued on. Then she was taken back to her room and checked for injuries.
Here is our first, second and third red flag.
First red flag - She was with an "instructor" on a "beginner slope". They are making a point of this.
Second red flag - She fell down and got back up and seemed to have no injuries. They are making a point of this as well.
Third red flag - She was all of a sudden taken back to her room and checked for injuries. What caused "them" to take her back to her room to be checked? They won't tell us that.
Have you ever fallen down at a ski resort while learning to ski with your instructor? Did you get back up and appear to be fine and actually you were really fine? That I think would be quite common. Why was it different here?
When she gets back to her room all of a sudden "they" think that she needs to go to the hospital. First one was in Canada, then she gets a transfer to a New York hospital. Why send her to Lenox Hill Hospital and not Mount Sinai? All rich and famouns people always go to Mount Sinai.
Of course by the time she gets to New York she is in a coma and eventually dies within hours. How odd.
When the death is finally announced they give no details of the injuries that determine a hospital is needed. They don't offer any details on why she was taken back to her room and checked. They don't offer any details on the cause of death and there is no mention of an autopsy being scheduled.
When I do the math on this problem I come up with MURDER as the answer. But why did they choose to eliminate her?
One word that the press seems to be throwing around is "Dynasty". The Redgrave Dynasty of stage actors. Her mother is Vanessa Redgrave and her father was Tony Richardson. Her aunt is Lynn Redgrave and her younger sister is Joely Richardson. Her grandfather was Michael Redgrave.
I guess you could call that a Dynasty if you wanted. I just think of them as actors.
Natasha was married to Liam Neeson and they have two sons. Neeson has just finished a movie that hit theatres this year called "Taken". He was working on another movie (in Canada) when this happened. But he wasn't there with her. He was on location and flew in when he was told there was an accident.
We all know that Vanessa was always a problem child when it came to her political views. She was always pro PLO and was a very defiant actress. Lynn was more flexible and didn't have any real political views.
I have never heard anything about Natasha and Liam as far as political views were concerned. They definitely weren't the Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandan of acting, spouting their political ideas every time the camera is turned on. But even Robbins and Sarandan don't seem to have problems.
But why Natasha and out of nowhere?
Murder. But not the type of murder that you would normally expect. This murder was one where I believe she was asked to take an IVF (Invitro Fertilization) and she told "them" to go blow. "They" don't like being told "NO".
The way Hollywood is pumping out babies and not to mention "twins" these days one must wonder to oneself why? Why twins and why all of Hollywood?
You can't convince me that it's a "trend" or it's fashionable. Pregnancy has never been trendy or fashionable. But what it has been and always will be is a way for people to gain immortality. How you ask? Immortality in the sense that fathers want their sons to carry on the family name and/or the heritage. For the line not to end. Women are only good for carrying the progeny and delivering them into the world. Only thing women are needed for in this respect. That doesn't mean that I agree with that attitude, it just means that it's a theory that I hold.
Obviously "they" wanted Natasha to breed for them. Mix her line with one of the elites line. The bloodline may have tied back in history anyway. But I am willing to say that she was approached to breed and she said "Get Lost". All of a sudden, skiing accident.
Watch the news and this will go away within days.
----------NEWSFLASH!!!!----------------
**Autopsy Report Released**
I would never have guessed it would happen. But the details were what I would expect from the powers that be. It was the details of what happened just after the accident that are more interesting.
Autopsy Report states that the cause of death was epidural hematoma (bleeding between the skull and the brain's covering), said Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the New York City medical examiner's office. Richardson was not wearing a helmet and the death was ruled an accident.
An epidural hematoma is often caused by a skull fracture. The bleeding causes a blood clot that puts pressure on the brain. That pressure can force the brain downward to press on the brain stem that controls breathing and other vital functions, causing coma or death. Frequently, surgeons cut off part of the skull to give the brain room to swell.
The newsflash goes on to say that Yves Coderre, director of operations at the emergency services company that sent paramedics to the Mont Tremblant resort where Richardson suffered her fall, told The Globe and Mail newspaper Wednesday the paramedics who responded were told they were not needed.
"They never saw the patient," Coderre said. "So they turned around."
Coderre said another ambulance was called later to Richardson's luxury hotel. By that point, her condition had gotten worse and she was rushed to a hospital.
Richardson said she felt fine after her spill but became ill later and complained of a headache. Doctors say sometimes patients with brain injuries have what's called a "lucid interval" where they act fine for an hour or more as the brain slowly, silently swells or bleeds.
Now the question that no one will ever ask out loud - Why did "they" handle the situation in that way?
We know why already but won't say it yet, they killed her on purpose.
There is not much of a story to begin with. Natasha was skiing in Canada (location really doesn't matter). She was with an "instructor" on a "beginner slope". She fell down, got back up, didn't seem to be impaired and continued on. Then she was taken back to her room and checked for injuries.
Here is our first, second and third red flag.
First red flag - She was with an "instructor" on a "beginner slope". They are making a point of this.
Second red flag - She fell down and got back up and seemed to have no injuries. They are making a point of this as well.
Third red flag - She was all of a sudden taken back to her room and checked for injuries. What caused "them" to take her back to her room to be checked? They won't tell us that.
Have you ever fallen down at a ski resort while learning to ski with your instructor? Did you get back up and appear to be fine and actually you were really fine? That I think would be quite common. Why was it different here?
When she gets back to her room all of a sudden "they" think that she needs to go to the hospital. First one was in Canada, then she gets a transfer to a New York hospital. Why send her to Lenox Hill Hospital and not Mount Sinai? All rich and famouns people always go to Mount Sinai.
Of course by the time she gets to New York she is in a coma and eventually dies within hours. How odd.
When the death is finally announced they give no details of the injuries that determine a hospital is needed. They don't offer any details on why she was taken back to her room and checked. They don't offer any details on the cause of death and there is no mention of an autopsy being scheduled.
When I do the math on this problem I come up with MURDER as the answer. But why did they choose to eliminate her?
One word that the press seems to be throwing around is "Dynasty". The Redgrave Dynasty of stage actors. Her mother is Vanessa Redgrave and her father was Tony Richardson. Her aunt is Lynn Redgrave and her younger sister is Joely Richardson. Her grandfather was Michael Redgrave.
I guess you could call that a Dynasty if you wanted. I just think of them as actors.
Natasha was married to Liam Neeson and they have two sons. Neeson has just finished a movie that hit theatres this year called "Taken". He was working on another movie (in Canada) when this happened. But he wasn't there with her. He was on location and flew in when he was told there was an accident.
We all know that Vanessa was always a problem child when it came to her political views. She was always pro PLO and was a very defiant actress. Lynn was more flexible and didn't have any real political views.
I have never heard anything about Natasha and Liam as far as political views were concerned. They definitely weren't the Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandan of acting, spouting their political ideas every time the camera is turned on. But even Robbins and Sarandan don't seem to have problems.
But why Natasha and out of nowhere?
Murder. But not the type of murder that you would normally expect. This murder was one where I believe she was asked to take an IVF (Invitro Fertilization) and she told "them" to go blow. "They" don't like being told "NO".
The way Hollywood is pumping out babies and not to mention "twins" these days one must wonder to oneself why? Why twins and why all of Hollywood?
You can't convince me that it's a "trend" or it's fashionable. Pregnancy has never been trendy or fashionable. But what it has been and always will be is a way for people to gain immortality. How you ask? Immortality in the sense that fathers want their sons to carry on the family name and/or the heritage. For the line not to end. Women are only good for carrying the progeny and delivering them into the world. Only thing women are needed for in this respect. That doesn't mean that I agree with that attitude, it just means that it's a theory that I hold.
Obviously "they" wanted Natasha to breed for them. Mix her line with one of the elites line. The bloodline may have tied back in history anyway. But I am willing to say that she was approached to breed and she said "Get Lost". All of a sudden, skiing accident.
Watch the news and this will go away within days.
----------NEWSFLASH!!!!----------------
**Autopsy Report Released**
I would never have guessed it would happen. But the details were what I would expect from the powers that be. It was the details of what happened just after the accident that are more interesting.
Autopsy Report states that the cause of death was epidural hematoma (bleeding between the skull and the brain's covering), said Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the New York City medical examiner's office. Richardson was not wearing a helmet and the death was ruled an accident.
An epidural hematoma is often caused by a skull fracture. The bleeding causes a blood clot that puts pressure on the brain. That pressure can force the brain downward to press on the brain stem that controls breathing and other vital functions, causing coma or death. Frequently, surgeons cut off part of the skull to give the brain room to swell.
The newsflash goes on to say that Yves Coderre, director of operations at the emergency services company that sent paramedics to the Mont Tremblant resort where Richardson suffered her fall, told The Globe and Mail newspaper Wednesday the paramedics who responded were told they were not needed.
"They never saw the patient," Coderre said. "So they turned around."
Coderre said another ambulance was called later to Richardson's luxury hotel. By that point, her condition had gotten worse and she was rushed to a hospital.
Richardson said she felt fine after her spill but became ill later and complained of a headache. Doctors say sometimes patients with brain injuries have what's called a "lucid interval" where they act fine for an hour or more as the brain slowly, silently swells or bleeds.
Now the question that no one will ever ask out loud - Why did "they" handle the situation in that way?
We know why already but won't say it yet, they killed her on purpose.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Morning Joe & Another Full News Blackout
Well they did it to us again. Another 3 days of nothing but an aircraft crash in New York this time. 48 suckers eliminated. The theories are rampant. Everyone is an expert.
Andrea Mitchell was sitting in for Mika this morning. I usually wait for those days because I would rather hear Andrea talk than Fuck Buddy harp. Plus, leaks usually are released through Andrea a lot of times and Fridays are good days for that so this was one of the better occasions. But NOOOOOOOO they had to take down a crappy plane and make that the NEWS for the ENTIRE WEEKEND. Now the powers that be can go about their business without worry that the press will interfere and maybe report something of importance by mistake.
I had to turn off Scar this morning because he was going on and on and on about all that he knew about aircraft and exactly what happened based on all the schooling he has had from chatting with pilots since his high school days. He is such an ass. He gives Bill O'Reilly some serious competition. If Scar would just shut the fuck up and go away things would be so much more interesting on that show.
But lets get back to the scam that is being run on everyone.
The take down was just that. A take down. The plane didn't just fall out of the sky. No, it wasn't ice on the wings and no, it wasn't mechanical errors. It was a strategic hit. Let's look at the usual suspects list to see why this was a regular take down.
1. Planes don't just explode on impact. This plane was carrying 5000 gallons of fuel and that was what was supposed to have caused the explosion. Jet fuel doesn't work like that.
2. One of the passengers was a 911 family member. We all know that those people are angry with the government and won't let up on the wrongful death lawsuits.
3. Obama is suffering from too much scrutiny right now and his mistakes are glaring. They need to deflect that.
4. The stimulus plan is not getting the right attention.
5. Bank CEO's are getting too much attention.
6. They are trying to install the right leader in Israel.
7. Increasing military troops in Afghanistan right now. We are facing a huge war you know.
8. The Dept of Homeland Security's first statement was the tip off of where this air crash is going to go. "We don't think it was a terrorism attack". Right, keep telling us that lie.
9. The survivors families are being quarantined. Wonder why that would be necessary?
These are all just the most obvious things that are sticking out like wet dicks from this story. But most idiots won't be paying attention since they are all doped up and can't hold a real thought in their heads anyway. So the blackout for the most part should work like a charm. By the time anyone figures out they MIGHT have been had, it will be much too late.
I guess that's just the way it goes.
I guarantee you by Monday morning, the stimulus bill will have been passed (along with a few others I'm sure), the Israeli president will have been installed, the troops will have magically appeared in Afghanistan, and a few other things will have mysteriously managed to have been dealt with. Monday should be worth watching.
I wonder how far the stock market will fall today?
Andrea Mitchell was sitting in for Mika this morning. I usually wait for those days because I would rather hear Andrea talk than Fuck Buddy harp. Plus, leaks usually are released through Andrea a lot of times and Fridays are good days for that so this was one of the better occasions. But NOOOOOOOO they had to take down a crappy plane and make that the NEWS for the ENTIRE WEEKEND. Now the powers that be can go about their business without worry that the press will interfere and maybe report something of importance by mistake.
I had to turn off Scar this morning because he was going on and on and on about all that he knew about aircraft and exactly what happened based on all the schooling he has had from chatting with pilots since his high school days. He is such an ass. He gives Bill O'Reilly some serious competition. If Scar would just shut the fuck up and go away things would be so much more interesting on that show.
But lets get back to the scam that is being run on everyone.
The take down was just that. A take down. The plane didn't just fall out of the sky. No, it wasn't ice on the wings and no, it wasn't mechanical errors. It was a strategic hit. Let's look at the usual suspects list to see why this was a regular take down.
1. Planes don't just explode on impact. This plane was carrying 5000 gallons of fuel and that was what was supposed to have caused the explosion. Jet fuel doesn't work like that.
2. One of the passengers was a 911 family member. We all know that those people are angry with the government and won't let up on the wrongful death lawsuits.
3. Obama is suffering from too much scrutiny right now and his mistakes are glaring. They need to deflect that.
4. The stimulus plan is not getting the right attention.
5. Bank CEO's are getting too much attention.
6. They are trying to install the right leader in Israel.
7. Increasing military troops in Afghanistan right now. We are facing a huge war you know.
8. The Dept of Homeland Security's first statement was the tip off of where this air crash is going to go. "We don't think it was a terrorism attack". Right, keep telling us that lie.
9. The survivors families are being quarantined. Wonder why that would be necessary?
These are all just the most obvious things that are sticking out like wet dicks from this story. But most idiots won't be paying attention since they are all doped up and can't hold a real thought in their heads anyway. So the blackout for the most part should work like a charm. By the time anyone figures out they MIGHT have been had, it will be much too late.
I guess that's just the way it goes.
I guarantee you by Monday morning, the stimulus bill will have been passed (along with a few others I'm sure), the Israeli president will have been installed, the troops will have magically appeared in Afghanistan, and a few other things will have mysteriously managed to have been dealt with. Monday should be worth watching.
I wonder how far the stock market will fall today?
Monday, February 9, 2009
All You Have To Do Is Say "I'm Sorry"
Bernie Madoff says "I'm Sorry" (but admits no guilt), he gets off with a fine. Guess we know who he's working for don't we?
Alex Rodriguez says, "I'm Sorry" for taking steroids and nothing happens to him. Guess we know how the sports "business" works don't we.
Tim Geithner says "I'm Sorry" for forgetting to pay taxes (Not!). What do you know, he gets hired to play the Treasury Secretary. How's that for saying the 2 magic words?
Tom Daschle says "I'm Sorry" for not paying his taxes on all the extras he was getting from a private company that he sat on the board of in California. He was smart he got out before it went any further.
Caroline Kennedy says "I'm Sorry" for not only not paying my taxes but hiring illegal aliens to work for me, (but what I do is none of anyone's business). Then she got out, which was the smartest thing she could have ever done because she had absolutely no personality.
This is just some of the people that have recently said the 2 magic words.
But those words only work for the rich and well to do. Those words don't do jack shit for the little people. If the tax man came around and wanted to know why you didn't pay your taxes and you told him "I'm Sorry", your ass would be in jail so fast that you wouldn't know what hit you. Not only that but the tax people would take everything you own. That is what "I'm Sorry" gets the little guy.
I am so sick of hearing that phrase I don't know what to do. But the sad thing is that we will keep on hearing it over and over again as these people come before us for whatever punishment they have coming for not doing something or other that they were either supposed to do or asked to do.
You can usually tell which it is by the form of punishment the person either takes or is subjected to in the media.
Bernie Madoff was easy. You could tell what his situation was. He was hired to do exactly what he did. The powers that be needed what happened to Bernie to happen. It was a cover story to hide something else more nefarious that was going on elsewhere. When whatever was happening was done, Bernie magically got off.
Bernie was an excellent soldier. He said nothing, gave no press conferences. You didn't hear from a lawyer and no one was making the Madoff rounds on the talk shows. You saw a few pictures of him and was constantly inundated with all the poor slobs who were his victims. But you heard nothing of any relevance to anything. Then magically on Friday in a 2 second blurb at 4:30 pm you hear "Breaking News". Bernie Madoff has been fined a small sum, has to pay back a few people and goes back to his 1 bunk Hilton to continue on his way as a Wall Street Investor. He admitted no guilt but said "I'm Sorry". That was all there was to it and you have heard not one single word since. Nor will you.
Bernie Madoff took the heat and kept his mouth shut and was well rewarded for it. He took the hit and took a piss like a man and walked without anything real happening to him and not 1 newscaster is questioning anything. How odd.
Or is it? I don't think so. Madoff had to be the fall guy for what happened. The powers that be basically took advantage of alot of offshore banks and shut them down through bad investments. Those were the real victims of this thing, not Kevin Bacon and those other idiots. That was window dressing. The powers that be needed those financial institutions shut down for a reason. They needed certain things accomplished and Bernie was their cover man for it. That simple.
Now things will continue as planned and everybody can get back to business because now the financial stimulus is in the news along with Tim Geithner. Now he is on the hot seat and taking the heat for the stimulus plan. Another fall guy. Will he take his piss like a man? Probably.
This whole thing is stupid and an insult to people's intelligence. The ones that have any intelligence left that is.
Alex Rodriguez says, "I'm Sorry" for taking steroids and nothing happens to him. Guess we know how the sports "business" works don't we.
Tim Geithner says "I'm Sorry" for forgetting to pay taxes (Not!). What do you know, he gets hired to play the Treasury Secretary. How's that for saying the 2 magic words?
Tom Daschle says "I'm Sorry" for not paying his taxes on all the extras he was getting from a private company that he sat on the board of in California. He was smart he got out before it went any further.
Caroline Kennedy says "I'm Sorry" for not only not paying my taxes but hiring illegal aliens to work for me, (but what I do is none of anyone's business). Then she got out, which was the smartest thing she could have ever done because she had absolutely no personality.
This is just some of the people that have recently said the 2 magic words.
But those words only work for the rich and well to do. Those words don't do jack shit for the little people. If the tax man came around and wanted to know why you didn't pay your taxes and you told him "I'm Sorry", your ass would be in jail so fast that you wouldn't know what hit you. Not only that but the tax people would take everything you own. That is what "I'm Sorry" gets the little guy.
I am so sick of hearing that phrase I don't know what to do. But the sad thing is that we will keep on hearing it over and over again as these people come before us for whatever punishment they have coming for not doing something or other that they were either supposed to do or asked to do.
You can usually tell which it is by the form of punishment the person either takes or is subjected to in the media.
Bernie Madoff was easy. You could tell what his situation was. He was hired to do exactly what he did. The powers that be needed what happened to Bernie to happen. It was a cover story to hide something else more nefarious that was going on elsewhere. When whatever was happening was done, Bernie magically got off.
Bernie was an excellent soldier. He said nothing, gave no press conferences. You didn't hear from a lawyer and no one was making the Madoff rounds on the talk shows. You saw a few pictures of him and was constantly inundated with all the poor slobs who were his victims. But you heard nothing of any relevance to anything. Then magically on Friday in a 2 second blurb at 4:30 pm you hear "Breaking News". Bernie Madoff has been fined a small sum, has to pay back a few people and goes back to his 1 bunk Hilton to continue on his way as a Wall Street Investor. He admitted no guilt but said "I'm Sorry". That was all there was to it and you have heard not one single word since. Nor will you.
Bernie Madoff took the heat and kept his mouth shut and was well rewarded for it. He took the hit and took a piss like a man and walked without anything real happening to him and not 1 newscaster is questioning anything. How odd.
Or is it? I don't think so. Madoff had to be the fall guy for what happened. The powers that be basically took advantage of alot of offshore banks and shut them down through bad investments. Those were the real victims of this thing, not Kevin Bacon and those other idiots. That was window dressing. The powers that be needed those financial institutions shut down for a reason. They needed certain things accomplished and Bernie was their cover man for it. That simple.
Now things will continue as planned and everybody can get back to business because now the financial stimulus is in the news along with Tim Geithner. Now he is on the hot seat and taking the heat for the stimulus plan. Another fall guy. Will he take his piss like a man? Probably.
This whole thing is stupid and an insult to people's intelligence. The ones that have any intelligence left that is.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Patrick Swayze Has AIDS
Well I was out doing my weekly grocery shopping the other day and as usual I always do a quick scan of the Hot Sheets before checking out. That is where the real news is anyway. But one thing has continued to bother me.
The Hot Sheets refuse to acknowledge the truth about Patrick Swayze. They will not come right out and say what needs to be said. He has AIDS.
What makes me giggle is the fact that as many famous people as we have seen that do in fact admit they have AIDS and we cannot tell when we actually see one of them. He has all the signs. He looks like AIDS.
Listen, the man now has pneumonia. That alone is one of the things that happens just before they die. Their immune system is shot. They get sick. But the powers that be want us to believe that chemo is the reason for this happening.
Here's the truth. Patrick Swayze, although not that great of an actor mind you, does not want his career to be remembered in the way so many have.....for being gay. He does not want to go out that way. That is why he has done the new cable TV show and is making what some are calling a "come back". Though it isn't really a comeback because he was never gone to begin with. He never made it as a top notch actor. He never made it past B grade acting. His most memorable role was "Dirty Dancing". Hardly Shakespearan wouldn't you say? But he doesn't want to be saddled with the gay moniker.
The man may not in fact be a full blown gay. He may have only had one gay experience in his life. Or he may be a former member of the male sex slavery ring. Usually you can tell them apart from the others because of the way they are billed to the public. Swayze was known for being "hot" in his younger days. He looked like he could have been gay. Most of the young actors coming up now are and you can tell it easily. They look and act gay.
Swayze has AIDS. It ain't got shit to do with pancreatic cancer. Sounds good in the headlines though and garners quite a bit of sympathy from the masses. But it ain't cancer people.
The Hot Sheets refuse to acknowledge the truth about Patrick Swayze. They will not come right out and say what needs to be said. He has AIDS.
What makes me giggle is the fact that as many famous people as we have seen that do in fact admit they have AIDS and we cannot tell when we actually see one of them. He has all the signs. He looks like AIDS.
Listen, the man now has pneumonia. That alone is one of the things that happens just before they die. Their immune system is shot. They get sick. But the powers that be want us to believe that chemo is the reason for this happening.
Here's the truth. Patrick Swayze, although not that great of an actor mind you, does not want his career to be remembered in the way so many have.....for being gay. He does not want to go out that way. That is why he has done the new cable TV show and is making what some are calling a "come back". Though it isn't really a comeback because he was never gone to begin with. He never made it as a top notch actor. He never made it past B grade acting. His most memorable role was "Dirty Dancing". Hardly Shakespearan wouldn't you say? But he doesn't want to be saddled with the gay moniker.
The man may not in fact be a full blown gay. He may have only had one gay experience in his life. Or he may be a former member of the male sex slavery ring. Usually you can tell them apart from the others because of the way they are billed to the public. Swayze was known for being "hot" in his younger days. He looked like he could have been gay. Most of the young actors coming up now are and you can tell it easily. They look and act gay.
Swayze has AIDS. It ain't got shit to do with pancreatic cancer. Sounds good in the headlines though and garners quite a bit of sympathy from the masses. But it ain't cancer people.
Ashton Kutcher is an Idiot
Did you read that story out about Ashton Kutcher who was awakened harshly the other morning by some other pod person doing construction work on their house next door? I did and wasn't impressed in the least by what supposedly took place.
When you pay attention in class you can easily spot "attention getters" when they happen. Pod people who can't seem to do anything interesting enough to stay in the public eye so they have to "create as artists" a phony attention getting situation to say "look at me". This is plainly what that was. Harken back to the days of old when Janet Jackson needed to promote her new album so she flashed everyone at the Super Bowl. That was an "attention getter". A "look at me" moment if you will.
Demi Moore would have been better off to do a striptease for the neighbors (whoever they were). But instead we supposedly got the Ashton Kutcher imitation of a "raving maniac". Complete mind you with video and sound recordings (for posterity of course).
The next day this "rampage" that Kutcher went on once he was "harshly" awakened by the sound of jackhammers in his ear was followed up by an apology to the neighbors video. He publicly apologized on his blog space and he and wife Demi were video tapped showering the neighboring pod people with Vitamin Water. Why it was like mana from heaven. Probably what the truth was was in fact the pod people next door out ranked Kutcher in blood line and told him to get his fucking shit together.
This is all stupid. Pod people live in a world that is so phony that if they EVER had to spend a moment BACK IN THE REAL WORLD they would kill themselves. They started out in the real world until being plucked from their adoptive parents and placed where they could be more "useful". Sound crazy? Not as crazy as the lives they live.
These freaks are being held up to us as pagan gods. We are supposed to worship them and consider them to be all powerful in some respect. I find that as time goes by the pod people are starting to actually look like the freaks they really are. The veneer is starting to come off. It's like a scene out of "Death Becomes Her". They are actually starting to look like the freaks they really are.
I used to be like everyone else. This is why I can talk. I know what it is like to look upon the stars and wish I could be like them or just be able to meet one or see one. I too, at one time put too much emphasis on something that was in fact not real at all. These pod people are created for our viewing enjoyment. THEY ARE NOT REAL.
Yes, they live and breath just like us and put their pants on just like us. They walk and talk just like us. But they are not just like us. They live in worlds that we don't. They eat and drink foods we don't. They shop where we don't. They live where we don't. They do jobs that we don't. They are not just like us.
Try to tell the majority of people that and they will think you quite insane. "Of course they are real people" the masses will tell you. "Of course they are just like us, they just got lucky is all". This is the mindset of the common man. This is the mindset that makes the pod people rich.
Now here is the kicker.
Most pod people have no real talent to speak of. They of course were born of royal blood (powers that be) and were placed among the little people to be raised up until that time when they would be taken back to whence they originally came. Those that aren't that royal are placed in Hollywood. Others placed in politics, others yet in the news media. Others still yet as world leaders, etc. Those that are put before you in any kind of public way, shape or form are not like you and me. Depending on their blood line levels determine where they go.
Those in Hollywood are not all talented. They are there due to their birthright AND they are also leftovers from the child sex slavery rings. They have to be utilized somehow. Where do you think the majority of kids living on the streets come from? Dumped after being used in the slavery rings and not fit for anything other than the streets. This is why they never get helped. Have you ever seen the supposed shelters and groups actually helping anyone? They don't. They are covers for something else. Yes, if you go to one you will see kids hanging around but they aren't doing anything about these kids. It looks good, but it doesn't do anything. If I had to guess it is nothing more than a monitoring station for the powers that be for the kids they are dumping to make sure that the kids don't start running their mouths about what is really going on.
Look, think about this for a moment. Have you ever seen in any town in America where you have large concentrations of homeless kids? The answer is a resounding NO. Why? Because if you want to see large concentrations of homeless kids look to the very cities where Hollywood is or fame and fortune can be found and that is where you will find them. You WILL NOT find them in Tucumcari, New Mexico. But you will find them dumped off in Seattle, Hollywood, New York City, etc. Places that are large and they can blend in where no questions get asked.
Call me crazy, but it is what it is. Dispute it if you want to but look around to see that my point is quite valid.
This is why you get the gay, drug and alcohol problems that you do in Hollywood. They are fucked up when they get there and given a license to continue their fucked up habit patterns in Hollywood under the guise of "artistic creativity". But what happens when you realize that hero of yours isn't all that creative to begin with and has been faking it all this time? Like say....oh I don't know Ashton Kutcher? The kid was one of the cast members of "That Seventies Show". He wasn't a stand out actor by any means. He got a few reality shows on MTV and VH1. ALL his movies are forgettable. He will never be in the ranks of more creative artists like John Malkovich or Tommy Lee Jones or Robert De Niro or Al Pacino. Ashton Kutcher is not talented and has to resort to yelling at his neighbors for attention. What a ridiculous situation to be in. How degrading.
It reminds me of the movie "Elephant Man" when the Elephant Man yells "I'm not a freak!". Yeah.....you are. So is Ashton Kutcher and that plastic wife of his Demi Moore. All of Hollywood are freaks. Didn't Brittany Spears pull back the curtain far enough for everyone to see what it is like in Hollywood for the untalented? She's not talented. She sounds just like every other female in the music business. There used to be a time when the singers had a distinct style and you could tell them by their style. Now they are cookie cutter singers. The music business has a particular sound that they believe the public not only wants but needs and they churn out singer after singer after singer after singer who sings exactly the same shitty way.
When are the people going to wake up and realize they are being played like suckers having these pod people thrust upon them like cheap kewpie dolls and made to think they are gods worthy of being in the heavens above? I hold out very little hope for the masses. They have taken too many drugs.
What I would like to know though is one thing: What the hell is in that Vitamin Water?
When you pay attention in class you can easily spot "attention getters" when they happen. Pod people who can't seem to do anything interesting enough to stay in the public eye so they have to "create as artists" a phony attention getting situation to say "look at me". This is plainly what that was. Harken back to the days of old when Janet Jackson needed to promote her new album so she flashed everyone at the Super Bowl. That was an "attention getter". A "look at me" moment if you will.
Demi Moore would have been better off to do a striptease for the neighbors (whoever they were). But instead we supposedly got the Ashton Kutcher imitation of a "raving maniac". Complete mind you with video and sound recordings (for posterity of course).
The next day this "rampage" that Kutcher went on once he was "harshly" awakened by the sound of jackhammers in his ear was followed up by an apology to the neighbors video. He publicly apologized on his blog space and he and wife Demi were video tapped showering the neighboring pod people with Vitamin Water. Why it was like mana from heaven. Probably what the truth was was in fact the pod people next door out ranked Kutcher in blood line and told him to get his fucking shit together.
This is all stupid. Pod people live in a world that is so phony that if they EVER had to spend a moment BACK IN THE REAL WORLD they would kill themselves. They started out in the real world until being plucked from their adoptive parents and placed where they could be more "useful". Sound crazy? Not as crazy as the lives they live.
These freaks are being held up to us as pagan gods. We are supposed to worship them and consider them to be all powerful in some respect. I find that as time goes by the pod people are starting to actually look like the freaks they really are. The veneer is starting to come off. It's like a scene out of "Death Becomes Her". They are actually starting to look like the freaks they really are.
I used to be like everyone else. This is why I can talk. I know what it is like to look upon the stars and wish I could be like them or just be able to meet one or see one. I too, at one time put too much emphasis on something that was in fact not real at all. These pod people are created for our viewing enjoyment. THEY ARE NOT REAL.
Yes, they live and breath just like us and put their pants on just like us. They walk and talk just like us. But they are not just like us. They live in worlds that we don't. They eat and drink foods we don't. They shop where we don't. They live where we don't. They do jobs that we don't. They are not just like us.
Try to tell the majority of people that and they will think you quite insane. "Of course they are real people" the masses will tell you. "Of course they are just like us, they just got lucky is all". This is the mindset of the common man. This is the mindset that makes the pod people rich.
Now here is the kicker.
Most pod people have no real talent to speak of. They of course were born of royal blood (powers that be) and were placed among the little people to be raised up until that time when they would be taken back to whence they originally came. Those that aren't that royal are placed in Hollywood. Others placed in politics, others yet in the news media. Others still yet as world leaders, etc. Those that are put before you in any kind of public way, shape or form are not like you and me. Depending on their blood line levels determine where they go.
Those in Hollywood are not all talented. They are there due to their birthright AND they are also leftovers from the child sex slavery rings. They have to be utilized somehow. Where do you think the majority of kids living on the streets come from? Dumped after being used in the slavery rings and not fit for anything other than the streets. This is why they never get helped. Have you ever seen the supposed shelters and groups actually helping anyone? They don't. They are covers for something else. Yes, if you go to one you will see kids hanging around but they aren't doing anything about these kids. It looks good, but it doesn't do anything. If I had to guess it is nothing more than a monitoring station for the powers that be for the kids they are dumping to make sure that the kids don't start running their mouths about what is really going on.
Look, think about this for a moment. Have you ever seen in any town in America where you have large concentrations of homeless kids? The answer is a resounding NO. Why? Because if you want to see large concentrations of homeless kids look to the very cities where Hollywood is or fame and fortune can be found and that is where you will find them. You WILL NOT find them in Tucumcari, New Mexico. But you will find them dumped off in Seattle, Hollywood, New York City, etc. Places that are large and they can blend in where no questions get asked.
Call me crazy, but it is what it is. Dispute it if you want to but look around to see that my point is quite valid.
This is why you get the gay, drug and alcohol problems that you do in Hollywood. They are fucked up when they get there and given a license to continue their fucked up habit patterns in Hollywood under the guise of "artistic creativity". But what happens when you realize that hero of yours isn't all that creative to begin with and has been faking it all this time? Like say....oh I don't know Ashton Kutcher? The kid was one of the cast members of "That Seventies Show". He wasn't a stand out actor by any means. He got a few reality shows on MTV and VH1. ALL his movies are forgettable. He will never be in the ranks of more creative artists like John Malkovich or Tommy Lee Jones or Robert De Niro or Al Pacino. Ashton Kutcher is not talented and has to resort to yelling at his neighbors for attention. What a ridiculous situation to be in. How degrading.
It reminds me of the movie "Elephant Man" when the Elephant Man yells "I'm not a freak!". Yeah.....you are. So is Ashton Kutcher and that plastic wife of his Demi Moore. All of Hollywood are freaks. Didn't Brittany Spears pull back the curtain far enough for everyone to see what it is like in Hollywood for the untalented? She's not talented. She sounds just like every other female in the music business. There used to be a time when the singers had a distinct style and you could tell them by their style. Now they are cookie cutter singers. The music business has a particular sound that they believe the public not only wants but needs and they churn out singer after singer after singer after singer who sings exactly the same shitty way.
When are the people going to wake up and realize they are being played like suckers having these pod people thrust upon them like cheap kewpie dolls and made to think they are gods worthy of being in the heavens above? I hold out very little hope for the masses. They have taken too many drugs.
What I would like to know though is one thing: What the hell is in that Vitamin Water?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
