Saturday, November 29, 2008

Dubai, the playground of the Rich & Famous

Well, I see that Dubai has opened up the biggest hotel (resort) in the world. Named "Atlantis The Palm" or Dubai Atlantis if you will. Everything it seems in Dubai is bigger, shinier, longer, wider, etc. Why, if I wasn't knowledgeable about history and the world I would think they were talking about Texas.

If you are wondering where all the money that is being stolen from the people is going, look to Dubai. They are showing off their most recent success. All of Hollywood went there and everyone who is anyone was there. I won't go into all the things that it has, you can read it for yourself. But I will tell you this that it makes Donald Trump look like he's a mere pissant.

I guess when you have a city that answers to no one and offers you everything that you could ever want including sex slaves and prostitution and children being sold on the black market then what more could a rich person want? I find it sad that the rich can only satisfy their desires by debasing themselves and others. What sick people they must be.

Of course all of Hollywood is born and bred out of sex slavery. Most, if not all of the people that have come up through Hollywood started off as kidnapped children who were taken into the sex trade. If not kidnapped then sold in by their parents.

You find this radical thinking? Well think about it a little more closely and watch and see how these people live their lives. They live as if they had been brought up that way. Alot if not the majority are all gay. Most if not all are drug abusers and sadists of some sort. Most if not all are crazy or clinically sick. I don't know of any normal people in the entertainment business. As much as I would like to think that some are normal, I have to admit that they aren't.

The chances of anyone in normal society knowing someone who was not famous and then became famous is rare if not unheard of. You hear of these people coming from normal places and they may have technically but they weren't raised normally. Most if not all Hollywood is sick.

Patty Duke is a good example of what I am talking about. When she wrote her story she touched on the subject but didn't go into alot of detail. But for those who knew what they were looking for could see what she was saying. Most people cannot comprehend these things because it defies everything that we are raised to believe. But it does happen, more than anyone wants to admit.

The fact that the rich have finally unveiled their all new and improved playground tells me alot. If you want to know where all the money has gone that has been taken away from the people, look to Dubai. Too bad you can't enjoy where you money has gone, but I don't think you would if you could considering what goes on in places like that. I know I wouldn't want to go there.

How sad it is that those places exist and children and women have to suffer working there against most of their wills to service the rich and their decadent desires. But then no one said the world was a wonderful place and we have Dubai to prove that.

Manchurian Candidates Called Forth To Duty

Yes, it's true. The Manchurian Candidates that live among us, ignorant of what they are have been called into service for their country. They appeared at WalMart in Long Island, NY and they have appeared at Toys R Us in Palm Desert, CA. They have also appeared in the form of an 8 year old child who shoots his father & his friend and a young Florida mother who has mysteriously "misplaced" her 2 year old daughter Caylee. Also appearing as a man shooting his wife & another person in a church in New Jersey. Also a man who supposedly killed an anchor woman in Arkansas.

My aren't they busy little bees? That is only a short list of just the recent stuff we are hearing about. God only knows what else is working that is only being locally reported. But the shopping murders are the most high profile ones.

You know what they are setting up for don't you? Take the guns away, among other things. Of course the stories of the shopping incidents make no sense when you stop and think about them. Why didn't anyone else get shot at Toys R Us? Why aren't they releasing any details? Why aren't the customers talking about what they witnessed? No one is saying anything of any real consequence. They are just repeating the regular buzz words. Nothing of relevance from either incident. Matter of fact the stories are now out of circulation.

The fact that they were able to get 2000 + black people at a WalMart in Long Island amazes me. Too much money in that area for something like that to happen. Not only that but it wasn't even a Super WalMart. They said in the news that they had 3 items on sale at the store with two of them being a vacuum cleaner for $28 and a plasma TV for $768. Doesn't sound interesting enough to get 2000 people in first thing in the morning. That's not a sale. There were plenty of pictures of that debacle and I am here to tell you that what I saw in 12 pictures does not measure up to the story that is being circulated.

Toys R Us is a weird experience. No names, no details, no nothing. But then again we aren't supposed to ask. I find it interesting that there were plenty of pictures to go around for the WalMart scenario but none for the Toys R Us. Why is that? Both stories went away at the same time.

The reason is because they are all Manchurian Candidates at work. Someone went around for the WalMart fiasco and rounded up all those people and promised them something of value for showing up. They were too mad. But definitely MKUltra slaves for Toys R Us and the rest of the other scenarios that are working in the news right now.

What is the goal here? What are they trying to achieve? Scare the people, frighten them? Make them doubt and wonder subconsciously so that they are more fearful? I think all those are possibilities. But it is the constant onslaught of these type of things.

Personally, I am of the school of thought that people for the most part are not that nutty by themselves. But when you start pumping them full of drugs and subconscious messaging and constant media attention to things that are detrimental to the general population's way of thinking you are going to get some real oddball behavior. Especially if these people are already in some kind of "treatment".We the people are under a constant onslaught of detrimental messaging. We get it from every angle and just trying to hold on to some kind of normal thinking is nearly impossible.

But I take comfort in knowing that when the messages need to be driven home to the masses they can call on their army of Mind Controlled slaves to come out with guns and god knows what else to wreak havoc in society. But if you scrutinize the scenarios and start looking for something that might make some sense you won't find anything. They don't want you to. Just take what they tell you and go on and mind your own business because the powers that be have everything under control thank you very much.

If you want to know who the slaves are just turn on the news or pick up a paper and you will see them all there front and center. There are many of them, no shortage that's for sure. Whenever they need them they are everywhere among us. You may be one for all you know.

Things are only going to get worse and more crazy until we are all pointing fingers at each other and turning everyone in for being a terrorist or some sick fuck. It's only just getting going good.

If you think that the spooks are conducting all this you're wrong. The psychiatrists are the majority of what is working when you deal with Mind Controlled slaves. They use certain words, phrases, drugs, routines, thought processes. The psychiatrists are the critical sources here. It isn't the Foggy Bottom Boys or the Oz crew. They perfected it, but they trained the psych doctors to carry out these things. That is how they reach so many.

When you think about how many people's minds are actually fertile grounds for these types of programming then you can easily see how it happens. If you take enough drugs and stop thinking for yourself and believe everything that is told to you then you are ripe for the picking. Think about how many kids were put in Ritalin back in the late 70's, 80's and 90's. They are grown people now probably still on it and other drugs as well. They push alot of drugs on children early only to add to it later.

Some may say that drugs are good. Well, maybe they are and then again maybe they aren't. I tend to think that anything that is created in a laboratory should be looked at with a high level of skepticism. I don't want to be dependent on synthetic drugs to live. If I get sick I try to treat myself naturally if at all possible. I have personal issues with aspirin, but will take straight aspirin from time to time if I have to. But with all the drugs that are in the foods and water and air, you just about have to treat those problems with other drugs. It is one sick cycle.

But if you take the time to take off those damn rose colored glasses and come into reality and admit to yourself that this is no fucking picnic and this life must be dealt with seriously then you may stand a chance. Otherwise forget it, take the drugs and go back to sleep.

Friday, November 28, 2008

Kill To Shop At WalMart

Well it looks like Black Friday is turning out to in fact be a black day indeed for Walmart.

The actual meaning of Black Friday involves businesses being able to make their yearly money on this one day of the year. When their books turn from red to black. That is the real meaning behind Black Friday. But this year I think it will take on a new meaning.

Walmart is probably one of the most hideous businesses known to humanity. It practices the most criminal type of business and forces people to shop at their stores by lowering prices to the point that people HAVE to shop there if they want certain things. It's psychological. Walmart officials will of course tell you "We don't make people shop here". No they don't physically put a gun to your head and drag you into the store and make you shop. But they do do it on a psychological level.

It's this simple: If you have $20 for groceries for the week where are you going to shop to get the most for your money? Walmart. Nuff said.

You don't want to shop there, but you have to because you have to be able to feed your family and provide other things as well. You have to, you have no choice. Not in this day and time you don't.

Walmart is fucking criminal. I hate that store, I hate the people who run it, who work in it and who own it. I have no respect for any Walmart employee. That is not the only job out there and they damn sure aren't paying that well. If you have ever talked to a former Walmart employee, they would never EVER go back to work for that company. Sometimes you can actually talk to a current employee who will tell you right in the store and right on their shift how they hate that company. Now that is an interesting conversation. I have actually had them.

A man died today at Walmart in fucking Long Island, New York. That place is not a poor area. Those people have money there. But according to the news report the people were such savages that they literally lifted the doors off the hinges and stormed the store stampeding an employee and killing him. They also took down a pregnant woman and another employee but not killing them.

What kind of people do this? What kind of people shop that way? Who were the people that did this and are they aware of what they did? What kind of people do that and walk away?

The Walmart lawyers are saying that they are working with police to bring this matter to justice because the welfare of their employees and customers are their top priority. BULLSHIT. The customers money is their top priority. But don't worry Walmart, people don't give a shit anymore so you have nothing to worry about. So a few employees are killed at your stores, no big deal, as long as the money flows.

I can understand the poor doing this type of thing. I didn't know the rich lowered their standards like that. I figured their noses were stuffed so high in the air that they wouldn't be able to stampede a damn thing. But I guess the rich can get down in the gutter with the useless eaters just as well. Makes me sleep better at night knowing this fact.

I wonder how Walmart will compensate the dead man's family? They will find a way to get around it I'm sure. Walmart isn't in the habit of paying anyone, they are only in the business of taking in money, not spending it out.

I think this is a sign of things to come. I literally believe that the people have been stirred into such a frenzy with the economy that this will happen anywhere that a SALE is going on in the near holiday future. People are desperate and desperate times call for desperate actions. Stampeding people to death to save a few dollars is only collateral damage in the end.

The powers that be must be celebrating a small victory today with the success of the Walmart in Long Island, New York. If they can only magnify that result nationwide, imagine the results in deaths they could rack up. Less people to have to worry about later if the useless eaters start killing off each other by stampeding them as they shop for that all sacred holiday known as Christmas. It always brings out the BEST in people.

But then pagan holidays should do that. Since they aren't good for much else.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Ever Heard of Bernard Freedman?

This is one of those times when everywhere you turn you can read some of the most interesting articles. I found one of them again today and am posting it here in its entirety.

When we can finally understand what really happened back in the day leading up and during World War II we can actually see parallels to what is happening today.

The Amazing Warnings of Benjamin Freedman
From Bible Believers.org.au
11-26-8

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

Introductory Note

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman Speaks:

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as "so-called Jews", because I know what they are). The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call "Jews".

There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today "Jews".

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Financial Stupidity At Its Most Glaring

I just read an article on the financial situation that the world is dealing with courtesy of the United States and its unbridled greed. I thought I would include it here since it is so well written and quite simple to understand.

This Is Not A Normal Recession (Moving On To Plan B)
By Mike Whitney
11-23-8

"The Winter of 2008-2009 will prove to be the winter of global economic discontent that marks the rejection of the flawed ideology that unregulated global financial markets promote financial innovation, market efficiency, unhampered growth and endless prosperity while mitigating risk by spreading it system wide." Economists Paul Davidson and Henry C.K. Liu "Open Letter to World Leaders attending the November 15 White House Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy"

The global economy is being sucked into a black hole and most Americans have no idea why. The whole problem can be narrowed down to two words; "structured finance".

Structured finance is a term that designates a sector of finance where risk is transferred via complex legal and corporate entities. It's not as confusing as it sounds. Take a mortgage-backed security (MBS), for example. The mortgage is issued by a bank (the loan originator) which then sells the mortgage to a brokerage where it is chopped up into tranches (pieces of the loan) and sold in a pool of mortgages to investors that are looking for a rate that is greater than Treasurys or similar investments. The process of transforming debt ("the mortgage") into a security is called securitization. At one time, the MBS was a reasonably safe investment because the housing market was stable and there were relatively few foreclosures. Thus, the chance of losing one's investment was quite small.

In the early years of the Bush administration, Wall Street took advantage of the gigantic flow of capital coming into the country ($700 billion per year via the current account deficit) by creating more and more MBS's and selling them to foreign banks, hedge funds and insurance companies. It was a real gold rush. Because the banks were merely the mortgage originators, they didn't believe their own money was at risk, so they gradually lowered lending standards and issued millions of loans to unqualified applicants who had no job, no collateral and a bad credit history. Securitization was such a hit, that by 2005, nearly 80 percent of all mortgages were securitized and the traditional criteria for getting a mortgage was abandoned altogether. Subprimes, Alt-As and ARMs flourished, while the "30 year fixed" went the way of the Dodo. Lenders were no longer constrained by "creditworthiness"; anyone with a pulse and a pen could get approved. The mortgages were then shipped off to Wall Street where they were sold to credulous investors.

The disaggregation of risk--spreading the risk to many investors via securitization--was as much of a factor in the creation of "the largest equity bubble in history", as the banks lax lending standards or Greenspan's low interest rates. By spreading risk throughout the system, securitization keeps interest rates artificially low because the real risks are not properly priced. The low interest rates, in turn, stimulate speculation which results in equity bubbles. Eventually, credit expansion leads to crisis when borrowers can no longer make the interest payments on their loans and defaults spiral out of control. This forces massive deleveraging and the fire-sale of assets in illiquid markets. As assets lose value, prices fall and the economy enters a deflationary cycle.

There are many types of of structured instruments including asset-backed securities (ABS), mortgage-backed securities (MBS), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) all of which provide a revenue stream from loans that were chopped into tranches and turned into securities. There are many problems with these complex securities, the biggest of which is that there is no way to unravel the individual pools of loans to isolate the bad paper. That's why subprime mortgages had such a destructive affect on the secondary market, because--even though subprimes only defaulted at a rate of roughly 5 percent--MBS sales slumped nearly 90 percent. Why? Former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill explained it like this: "It's like you have 8 bottles of water and just one of them has arsenic in it. It becomes impossible to sell any of the other bottles because no one knows which one contains the poison."

Exactly right. So why weren't these structured debt-instruments "stress tested" before the markets were reworked and the financial system became so dependent on them?

Greed. Because the real purpose of these exotic investments is not to provide true value to the buyer, but to maximize profits for the seller by increasing leverage. That is the real purpose of MBS, CDOs and all the other bizarre-sounding derivatives; higher profits with less capital. It's a scam. Here's how it works: A mortgage applicant buys a house for $400,000 and puts 10 percent down. His mortgage is sold to Wall Street, chopped into pieces, and stitched together in a pool of similar loans. Now the brokerage can use the debt as if it were an asset, borrowing at ratios of 20 or 30 to 1 to fatten the bottom line.

When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken into conservatorship by the government, they were leveraged at an eye-popping 100 to 1. This shows that nearly an infinite amount of debt can be precariously balanced atop a paltry amount of capital. This explains why the $4 trillion aggregate value of the 5 big investment banks and the $1.7 trillion value of the hedge funds is now vanishing more quickly than it was created. Once the mighty gears of structured finance shift into reverse, deleveraging begins with a vengeance pulling trillions into a credit vacuum.

It all started when two Bear Stearns hedge funds defaulted in July 2006 and there were no offers for their MBS's and other structured investments. Panic quickly spread to every corner of Wall Street as the alchemists of modern finance began to see that their worst nightmare might be realized, that trillions of dollars of Frankenstein investments could be worth nothing at all.

Since the Bear Stearns funds fiasco, there have been huge explosions in the financial markets. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Indybank, AIG, Lehman Bros and other industry giants have either gone under or been forced into shotgun weddings by the FDIC. The stock market has plunged over 40 percent and suffered wild gyrations not seen since the 1930s. The entire Wall Street landscape has changed completely. Investment banking is no longer a viable business model; the Big 5 have either vanished or transformed themselves into holding companies to escape short sellers. The hedge funds have been deleveraging with a ferocity that has sent sent stocks and commodities crashing. In one day last week, the stock market plunged 300 points in the morning only to bounce back 550 points a few hours later; a whopping 850 point-spread in one trading day! No one but a madman would dabble in this market. Cautious investors have pulled up stakes and moved to the safety of Treasurys. Meanwhile, the financial tsunami is roaring through the real economy where consumer confidence has plummeted, unemployment is soaring and retail sales have fallen to historic lows. The downdraft from the financial markets has flattened Main Street and set the stage for a humongous $500 billion stimulus package to be delivered in the first few months of the Obama administration. The meltdown appears to be playing out much like Henry Paulson anticipated. According to Bloomberg News : "Shortly after leaving Wall Street as Goldman Sachs' CEO, Henry Paulson was at Camp David warning the president and his staff of "over-the-counter derivatives as an example of financial innovation that could, under certain circumstances, blow up in Wall Street's face and affect the whole economy." (PAUL B. FARRELL, "30 reasons for Great Depression 2 by 2011", MarketWatch)

So far, the Federal Reserve has provided nearly $2 trillion through its lending facilities just to keep the financial system upright. The Treasury is currently distributing $700 billion to key banks and other financial institutions that are perceived to be "too big to fail". In truth, the "too big to fail" mantra is a just a public relations hoax to conceal the web of counter-party deals that make it impossible for one institution to fail without dominoing through the rest of the system and wreaking havoc. That's why AIG is still on life-support with regular injections of taxpayer money; because it had roughly $4 trillion of credit default swaps (structured "hedges" that are not traded on a regulated exchange) for which AIG does not have sufficient capital reserves. In other words, the taxpayer is now paying the debts of an insurance company that didn't set aside the money to pay its claims. (As yet, No SEC indictments for securities fraud) In fact, the Fed and Treasury are now providing a backstop for the entire structured finance system which is frozen solid and shows no sign of thawing any time soon.

This is not a normal recession, which is a downturn in the business cycle and "a period of reduced economic activity" usually brought on by a mismatch between supply and demand. (that ends in two quarters of negative growth) The present situation is much graver; it is the utter destruction of a system that was developed fairly recently and has proven to be thoroughly dysfunctional. It cannot withstand the effects of tighter credit or adverse market conditions. This is not a cyclical downturn; the structured finance system has collapsed leaving behind a multi-trillion dollar capital hole that is bringing the broader economy to its knees.

One by one, we have seen the structured instruments fail; mortgage-backed securities (MBS), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), credit default swaps (CDS), commercial paper (CP), auction rate securities. Now we are seeing investors boycott anything related to structured investments. This is from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis:

"There were NO sales of bonds backed by credit-card payments in October, the first time since 1993, when the asset-backed securities market was in its infancy. Yields on top-rated credit card bonds relative to benchmark interest rates reached a record high of 525 basis points more than the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, last week, according to Bank of America Corp. data."

Wall Street has turned off the faucet for securitized investments. That market is toast. The only reason that Libor and the other gauges of interbank lending have normalized is because the Fed guaranteed money markets and commercial paper. It has nothing to do with trust between the banks themselves. There is no trust. Even so, the banks are not capable of making up for the vast amount of credit which was produced by the now-defunct investment banks and hedge funds which are constrained by losses of nearly $3.5 trillion; half of their total value. In the best case scenario, bank credit will only shrink 15 or 20 percent, which will put the US on track for a deep "18 month to 2 year" recession rather than another Great Depression.

Paulson's attempt to divert $30 billion to non-bank financial institutions to revive loan securitization when there is no appetite among investors for such structured junk is pure folly. More troubling, is that neither Paulson nor Bernanke have a Plan B; an alternate scheme for rebuilding the financial markets on a solid, sustainable foundation rather than low interest rates and pools of debt. Everything they have done so far, suggests that they are focused on one thing alone; inflating another equity bubble. "Inflate or die", as the saying goes; and Bernanke intends to achieve this objective using the same tools that brought us to the brink of catastrophe. Here's a clip from a recent speech by Bernanke which shows his determination to prop up the broken system:

"The ability of financial intermediaries to sell the mortgages they originate into the broader capital market by means of the securitization process serves two important purposes: First, it provides originators much wider sources of funding than they could obtain through conventional sources, such as retail deposits; second, it substantially reduces the originator's exposure to interest rate, credit, prepayment, and other risks associated with holding mortgages to maturity, thereby reducing the overall costs of providing mortgage credit."

Sorry, Ben, the funding has dried up and the banks have shown no interest in going back to the days of conventional "30-year fixed" mortgages. It's a dead letter. The Fed and Treasury need to stop looking for ways to reflate the bubble and work to restore confidence in the markets by increasing regulation and reducing the amount of leverage that's allowable to 12 to 1. After all, it's no coincidence that AIG, Fannie and Freddie, Lehman Bros, General Motors, General Electric have all fallen off a cliff at the very same time. They are all victims of the same low interest, easy money finance swindle which allowed them to roll over huge amounts of short-term debt at artificially low cost. When Bear blew up; lending tightened, demand weakened, and credit was flushed from the system at an unprecedented pace. Borrowing short for long-term investments is not feasible when credit becomes scarce, but it's not because the banks aren't lending. That's just another myth that keeps the public from seeing what's really going on. As Jon Hilsenrath points out in his Wall Street Journal article, "Banks Keep Lending, but that isn't easing the crisis", that is not the case:

"Banks actually are lending at record levels. Their commercial and industrial loans, at $1.6 trillion in early November, were up 15% from a year earlier and grew at a 25% annual rate during the past three months, according to weekly Federal Reserve data. Home-equity loans, at $578 billion, were up 21% from a year ago and grew at a 48% annual rate in three months....The numbers point to one of the great challenges of the crisis. The credit crunch is surely real, but it is complex and not easily managed. Banks are lending, but they're also under serious strain as they act as backstops to a larger problem -- the breakdown of securities markets..The worst of the credit crisis is being felt not in banks but in financial markets..."

The banks are not to blame. There is a generalized contraction of credit in the non-bank financial system where structured finance has blown up and taken half of Wall Street with it. It's the end of an era. Here's how economist Henry C. K. Liu sums it up in his "Open Letter to World Leaders attending the November 15 White House Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy":

"Neoliberal economists in the last three decades have denied the possibility of a replay of the worldwide destructiveness of the Great Depression that followed the collapse of the speculative bubble created by unfettered US financial markets of the 'Roaring Twenties'. They fooled themselves into thinking that false prosperity built on debt could be sustainable with monetary indulgence. Now history is repeating itself, this time with a new, more lethal virus that has infested deregulated global financial markets with 'innovative' debt securitization, structured finance and maverick banking operations flooded with excess liquidity released by accommodative central banks. A massive structure of phantom wealth was built on the quicksand of debt manipulation. This debt bubble finally imploded in July 2007 and is now threatening to bring down the entire global financial system to cause an economic meltdown unless enlightened political leadership adopts coordinated corrective measures on a global scale."

Rome is burning. It's time to stop tinkering with a failed system and move on to "Plan B" before it's too late.

End of Article

You know you would think that people would catch the snaps eventually. But they don't. There are people today who are buying houses at horrendous prices and setting themselves up for mortgages that they cannot afford if just one thing goes wrong for them bookkeeping wise. That is a hell of a risk to take on one of the two most important investments a regular person will make in his lifetime. But some people never learn, or they labor under the false belief that they are 10 feet tall and bulletproof.

You would think that the Enron fiasco would have been a good example of what was on the horizon. They were testing it out then and saw what they thought they needed to do or change to make it work.

How people can be so foolish. But they will never look in the mirror and blame themselves, it always has to be someone else's fault.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Word to the So Called "Christian Leaders"

I just read an article by a preacher calling Bam Bam an "Uncle Tom" and that he is planning to pass legislation to allow people the RIGHT to make their own choices when it comes to ABORTION. It was one of the most ludicrous articles I have ever read. While the words all made sense and the author was not rambling or babbling incoherently, he sounded like a damn fool.

Now, despite how I may talk I do believe in God and I believe in Jesus Christ. I have a personal relationship with Jesus believe it or not. He knows my temper and my viewpoints and we are in fact working on those. But I do speak my mind and try to be honest as opposed to politically correct.

I've read the bible. I know what it says. I also know that preachers are in some serious shit come judgment day because of how they are misleading their congregations. But then who am I to tell them. Let them have the right to decide how they want to be as preachers and God will deal with them personally on judgment day. I just don't think they will like the end result is all. But they have the freedom to choose, which is more than they are allowing women who are faced with decisions on whether or not to have an unwanted baby.

I personally believe that all women should make the choice with what they will do with their bodies and their unborn children, because they will be in the same line as the all the rest of us on judgment day having to answer for their sins. So where is the agro here? Why are people concerned with this?

You will get an enormous crowd of people saying in unison "But It's MURDER!". So what? Murder goes on all the time. Murder takes many, many forms. Some of them just happen to be physical. But if scripture says to not place judgment then what are all the Christians doing?

Last time I checked my bible, Jesus was the only other one who could lay down judgment on someone, but he could also pardon sin and bless. I don't remember him giving that particular power to his disciples. They could heal the sick and do whatever it is that disciples do but they were not in a position to cast judgment. The closest that I believe a disciple ever got to doing that was when Stephen admonished the Sanhedrin for their sins against God. But Stephen was stoned to death by them for that. God says that JUDGMENT IS MINE. That is something that is supposed to be exclusive only to God. So why are preachers encouraging this act?

Preachers are the worst ones to be telling people what is right and what is wrong. They are some of the most sinful, loathsome people in religion. It is easier to show me a preacher who has money on the brain and/or cheats on his wife with a congregation member or a preacher who is into drugs and/or homosexuality. It is practically impossible to show me a preacher that is honest and truly cares for the word of God or who lives and dresses modestly and acts with some humiliation. I know I haven't seen any lately. I don't think they exist actually. I do not know of a church right now that I would be willing to walk into and listen to what the preacher had to say.

All people are created "equally" by God "in his image" and are given the right by God to choose freely. They are not supposed to be hindered by man in their decision making process or the one who hinders them will reap the blame. People don't think about this. They are too in your face about what they "think" you should do. It's all about pressuring others to do what you want them to. Instead of letting people live their lives and take responsibility for their own actions.

If a woman wants to sleep around and get pregnant she must take responsibility for every action. EVERY ACTION. That includes the abortion. I can't help the fact that some preacher can't have his way because he is so absorbed in megalomania that he can't see the word of God anymore. But that preacher, if he tries to instill his will into any situation where he is trying to intimidate by GUILT someone trying to make a life or death decision, then that preacher will take on the judgment of that act as well.

Death comes in many forms. We are not privy to God's plans and how he executes things. We are supposed to go on faith and accept what happens as God's will and not try to second guess God. It ain't up to us. We are to be about the business God has given to us, not be worrying about our neighbors and what they are or aren't doing. We are supposed to set examples. Not hit people over the head to get their attention. If they look at us and see the way we are living and want that same thing, then we have set an example. That is how it should be. Not out carrying signs and screaming and blowing up buildings to bring people to God. That's satan's work, not God's. And if people are acting like that I wonder if they do know God, because if they do would they be out there doing that? Who knows? I know that God does not need man to bring down an abortion clinic. He is perfectly capable of doing that himself without man's help. We aren't supposed to judge. But I'm doing just that in talking about it here. So I have sinned. It is up to me to seek forgiveness for this sin.

I know for a fact that according to the bible I read, God can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants to whomever he wants. He asks no one their permission. He is to not be questioned either as to his reasons or actions. He owes us nothing. But when man starts to step in and play the role of God's spokesman or God's right hand man then that person is stepping into dangerous territory. Does he know God's will for him? He better be checking his information a second and third time before he does anything. We have an inborn understanding of right and wrong. We are supposed to pray and follow the right path. Chances are if something is not right then it isn't of God. So doing violent acts towards women or abortion clinics or doctors most probably isn't of God I would think.

My last word on this is to Christians to leave people alone and let them make their own decisions and stop trying to run the whole world and force them to a God that comes off looking like some kind of idiot.

YOU'RE GIVING GOD A BAD NAME!!! Stop it and go worry about your own problems and stop doing shitty PR work for GOD!